枚举定义
enum IpAddrKind {
V4,
V6,
}
枚举方法
fn main() {
enum Message {
Quit,
Move { x: i32, y: i32 },
Write(String),
ChangeColor(i32, i32, i32),
}
impl Message {
fn call(&self) {
// method body would be defined here
}
}
let m = Message::Write(String::from("hello"));
m.call();
}
Option
match使用
枚举属性的类型统一为枚举的名称
enum IpAddrKind {
V4,
V6,
}
let four = IpAddrKind::V4;
let six = IpAddrKind::V6;
Note that the variants of the enum are namespaced under its identifier, and we use a double colon to separate the two. The reason this is useful is that now both values IpAddrKind::V4
and IpAddrKind::V6
are of the same type: IpAddrKind
. We can then, for instance, define a function that takes any IpAddrKind
:
fn route(ip_kind: IpAddrKind) {}
route(IpAddrKind::V4);
route(IpAddrKind::V6);
enum IpAddrKind {
V4,
V6,
}
struct IpAddr {
kind: IpAddrKind,
address: String,
}
let home = IpAddr {
kind: IpAddrKind::V4,
address: String::from("127.0.0.1"),
};
let loopback = IpAddr {
kind: IpAddrKind::V6,
address: String::from("::1"),
};
enum IpAddr {
V4(String),
V6(String),
}
let home = IpAddr::V4(String::from("127.0.0.1"));
let loopback = IpAddr::V6(String::from("::1"));
fn main() {
enum IpAddr {
V4(u8, u8, u8, u8),
V6(String),
}
let home = IpAddr::V4(127, 0, 0, 1);
let loopback = IpAddr::V6(String::from("::1"));
}
#![allow(unused_variables)]
fn main() {
struct Ipv4Addr {
// --snip--
}
struct Ipv6Addr {
// --snip--
}
enum IpAddr {
V4(Ipv4Addr),
V6(Ipv6Addr),
}
}
enum Message {
Quit,
Move { x: i32, y: i32 },
Write(String),
ChangeColor(i32, i32, i32),
}
This enum has four variants with different types:
Quit
has no data associated with it at all.Move
includes an anonymous struct inside it.Write
includes a single String
.ChangeColor
includes three i32
values.fn main() {
enum Message {
Quit,
Move { x: i32, y: i32 },
Write(String),
ChangeColor(i32, i32, i32),
}
impl Message {
fn call(&self) {
// method body would be defined here
}
}
let m = Message::Write(String::from("hello"));
m.call();
}
[derive(Debug)] 会自动实现一个输出格式,然后就可以使用{:?}输出枚举
fn testEnum(){
#\[derive(Debug)\]
enum Message {
Quit,
Move{x: i16, y: i16},
Write(String),
ChangeColor(i32,i32,i32),
}
impl Message {
fn call(&self) {
let v1 = Message::Quit;
let v2 = Message::Move{x: 25, y: 25};
let v4 = Message::ChangeColor(100,100,100);
println!("{:#?} ",v1);
println!("{:#?} ",v2);
println!("{:?}",v4);
}
}
let m = Message::Write(String::from("enum show "));
println!("{:?}",m);
m.call();
}
Write("enum show ")
Quit
Move {
x: 25,
y: 25,
}
ChangeColor(100, 100, 100)
Rust枚举中一个超级重要的的特性:所有枚举都是同一类型,这一点在rust中的应用, 相当于Java的抽象、继承,相当于C++中的泛型,针对此特点,特举例如下
#[derive(Debug)]
enum WorkSort {
Student,
Teacher,
Doctor,
}
impl WorkSort{
pub fn desc(&self){
println!("I am a {:?}",self);
}
}
pub fn test1(){
let tch = WorkSort::Teacher;
tch.desc();
let std = WorkSort::Student;
std.desc();
}
调用test1方法,输出
I am a Teacher
I am a Student
The Option Enum and Its Advantages Over Null Values
Programming language design is often thought of in terms of which features you include, but the features you exclude are important too. Rust doesn’t have the null feature that many other languages have. Null is a value that means there is no value there. In languages with null, variables can always be in one of two states: null or not-null.
The problem isn’t really with the concept but with the particular implementation. As such, Rust does not have nulls, but it does have an enum that can encode the concept of a value being present or absent. This enum is Option<T>
, and it is defined by the standard library as follows:
#![allow(unused_variables)]
fn main() {
enum Option
Some(T),
None,
}
}
The Option<T>
enum is so useful that it’s even included in the prelude; you don’t need to bring it into scope explicitly. In addition, so are its variants: you can use Some
and None
directly without the Option::
prefix. The Option<T>
enum is still just a regular enum, and Some(T)
and None
are still variants of type Option<T>
.
For now, all you need to know is that <T>
means the Some
variant of the Option
enum can hold one piece of data of any type. Here are some examples of using Option
values to hold number types and string types:
fn main() {
let some_number = Some(5);
let some_string = Some("a string");
let absent\_number: Option<i32> = None;
}
In short, because Option<T>
and T
(where T
can be any type) are different types, the compiler won’t let us use an Option<T>
value as if it were definitely a valid value. For example, this code won’t compile because it’s trying to add an i8
to an Option<i8>
:
fn main() {
let x: i8 = 5;
let y: Option
let sum = x + y;//error
}
The match Control Flow Operator
Rust has an extremely powerful control flow operator called match that allows you to compare a value against a series of patterns and then execute code based on which pattern matches. Patterns can be made up of literal values, variable names, wildcards, and many other things;
fn main() {
println!("----------match----------");
let coin = Coin::Penny;
let res = value_in_cents(coin);
println!("{}",res);
let coin = Coin::Dime;
let res = value\_in\_cents(coin);
println!("{}",res);
}
enum Coin {
Penny,
Nockel,
Dime,
Quarter,
}
fn value_in_cents(coin: Coin) -> u8 {
match coin {
Coin::Penny => 1,
Coin::Nockel => 5,
Coin::Dime => 10,
Coin::Quarter => 25,
}
}
$ cargo run
Compiling enum_match v0.1.0 (/opt/wks/rust_study/enum_match)
warning: variant is never constructed: `Nockel`
--> src/main.rs:15:5
|
15 | Nockel,
| ^^^^^^
|
= note: `#[warn(dead_code)]` on by default
warning: variant is never constructed: `Quarter`
--> src/main.rs:17:5
|
17 | Quarter,
| ^^^^^^^
warning: 2 warnings emitted
Finished dev \[unoptimized + debuginfo\] target(s) in 0.52s
Running \`target/debug/enum\_match\`
----------match----------
1
10
#[derive(Debug)]
enum UsState {
Alabama,
Alaska,
// --snip--
}
enum Coin {
Penny,
Nickel,
Dime,
Quarter(UsState),
}
fn value_in_cents(coin: Coin) -> u8 {
match coin {
Coin::Penny => 1,
Coin::Nickel => 5,
Coin::Dime => 10,
Coin::Quarter(state) => {
println!("State quarter from {:?}!", state);
25
}
}
}
fn main() {
value_in_cents(Coin::Quarter(UsState::Alaska));
}
Option
#[derive(Debug)]
enum Option
None,
Some(T)
}
fn plus_one(x: Option
match x {
Option::None => Option::None,
Option::Some(i) => Option::Some(i+1),
}
}
fn test_match(){
let five = Option::Some(5);
let six = plus_one(five);
println!("{:?}",six);
let none = plus_one(Option::None);
println!("{:?}",none);
}
Matches Are Exhaustive
fn main() {
fn plus_one(x: Option
match x {
Some(i) => Some(i + 1),
}
}
let five = Some(5);
let six = plus\_one(five);
let none = plus\_one(None);
}
We didn’t handle the None
case, so this code will cause a bug. Luckily, it’s a bug Rust knows how to catch. If we try to compile this code, we’ll get this error:
$ cargo run
Compiling enums v0.1.0 (file:///projects/enums)
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `None` not covered
--> src/main.rs:3:15
|
3 | match x {
| ^ pattern `None` not covered
|
= help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled, possibly by adding wildcards or more match arms
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0004`.
error: could not compile `enums`.
To learn more, run the command again with --verbose.
The _ Placeholder
Rust also has a pattern we can use when we don’t want to list all possible values. For example, a u8
can have valid values of 0 through 255. If we only care about the values 1, 3, 5, and 7, we don’t want to have to list out 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 all the way up to 255. Fortunately, we don’t have to: we can use the special pattern _
instead:
fn main() {
let some_u8_value = 0u8;
match some_u8_value {
1 => println!("one"),
3 => println!("three"),
5 => println!("five"),
7 => println!("seven"),
_ => (),
}
}
_ => (),
这一行表示轮空,什么也不会输出
The _
pattern will match any value. By putting it after our other arms, the _
will match all the possible cases that aren’t specified before it. The ()
is just the unit value, so nothing will happen in the _
case. As a result, we can say that we want to do nothing for all the possible values that we don’t list before the _
placeholder.
However, the match
expression can be a bit wordy in a situation in which we care about only one of the cases. For this situation, Rust provides if let
.
Concise Control flow with if let
#![allow(unused_variables)]
fn main() {
println!("Hello, match!");
let1();
let2();
}
#[derive(Debug)]
enum Option
Some(T),
None
}
fn let1(){
let some_u3_value = Option::Some(0u8);
match some_u3_value {
Option::Some(3) => println!("three"),
_ => (),
}
if let Option::Some(3) = some\_u3\_value{
println!("three");
}
}
fn let2(){
let some_u3_value = Option::Some(0u8);
let mut count = 0;
match some_u3_value {
Option::Some(3) => println!("three"),
_ => count += 1,
}
if let Option::Some(3) = some\_u3\_value{
println!("three");
}else{
count += 1;
}
println!("{}",count);
}
手机扫一扫
移动阅读更方便
你可能感兴趣的文章